Gold Coin
A gold coin is a coin made mostly or entirely of gold. Gold has been for coins practically since the invention of coinage, originally because of gold's intrinsic value. In modern times, most gold coins sold either to collectors, or to be used as bullion coins— coins whose nominal value is irrelevant and which serve primarily as a method of investing in gold. Gold has been as money for many reasons. It is fungible, meaning that it trades easily, with a low spread between the prices to buy and sell. Gold is also easily transportable, as it has a high value to weight ratio, compared to other commodities, such as silver. Gold can be into smaller units, without destroying its value; it melts into ingots, and re-coined. The density of gold is higher than most other metals, making it difficult to pass counterfeits. Gold is extremely un-reactive. The scarcity of gold stabilizes its value. Precious metals in bulk form are bullion, and trade on commodity markets. Bullion metals cast into ingots, or minted into coins. The defining attribute of bullion is that it is valued by its mass and purity rather than by a face value as money. While obsolete gold coins are primarily collected for their numismatic value, gold bullion coins today derive their value from the metal (gold) content — and as such are viewed by some investors as a "hedge" against inflation or a store of value. Many nations mint bullion coins. Investment quality coins minted after 1800 have a purity of not less than 900 thousands and are legal tender in its country of origin. Although nominally issued as legal tender, these coins' face value as currency is far below that of their value as bullion. The European Commission publishes annually a list of gold coins, which are as investment gold coins in all EU Member States. The list has legal force and supplements the law. In the United Kingdom, HM Revenue and Customs have added an additional list of gold coins alongside the European Commission list. These are gold coins that HM Revenue & Customs recognize as falling within the exemption for investment gold coins. This second list does not have legal force. South Africa introduced the Krugerrand in 1967 to cater to this market; this was the reason for its convenient and memorable gold content — exactly one troy ounce. It was the first modern, low premium (i.e. priced only slightly above the bullion value of the gold) gold bullion coin. Bullion coins are also in fractions of an ounce – typically half ounce, quarter ounce, and one-tenth ounce. Bullion coins sometimes carry a face value as legal tender, the face value is on the coin, and in order to bestow legal tender status on a coin, which generally makes it easier to import or export across national borders, as well as subject to counterfeiting. However, their real value is as dictated by their troy weight, the current market price of the precious metal contained, and the prevailing premium that market wishes to pay for those particular bullion coins. The face value is always significantly less than the bullion value of the coin. Legal tender bullion coins are a separate entity to bullion gold. One enjoys legal tender status; the latter is merely a raw commodity. Gold has an international currency code of XAU under ISO 4217. ISO 4217 includes codes not only for currencies, but also for precious metals and certain other entities used in international finance, e.g. Special Drawing Rights. Coins are usually made of an alloy as other metals are into the coin to make it more durable. Fineness is the actual gold content in a coin or bar and expressed in grams or troy ounces. Karat weight is a unit of fineness for gold equal to 1/24 part of pure gold in an alloy. Pure gold is 1000 fine. Below is a karat weight to fineness conversion chart. There is a correlation between karats and fineness: 24 karats = 1000 fine, 23 karats = 958.3 fine, 22 karats = 916.6 fine, 21 karats = 875.0 fine, 20 karats = 833.3 fine, 18 karats = 750.0 fine, 16 karats = 666.7 fine, 14 karats = 583.3 fine, 10 karats = 416.6 fine. The fineness converts to a percent, as well. If a gold coin has a fineness of .900, the decimal point is moved two places to the right and that number is expressed as a percent - that is 90.0% pure gold. If a gold coin has a fineness of .850, then the gold coin is 85.0% pure, etc. Coins have varied greatly in fineness through history. Notable historical standards that were closely adhered-to include the crown gold (22 karat) used in all English gold coins intended for circulation from 1526 onward, and 0.900 fine (21.6 kt), the standard for all American circulation-coins from 1837 onward. Fineness is not the only way to value a gold coin; a great deal of value in collector coins comes from condition and rarity. To a far lesser extent, even the value of gold bullion coins is influenced by their physical condition.
Attorneys Fee
Attorney's fee is a chiefly United States term for compensation for legal services performed by an attorney lawyer or law firm for a client, in or out of court. It may be an hourly, flat-rate or contingent fee. Attorney fees are separate from fines, compensatory and punitive damages, and except in Nevada from court costs in a legal case. Surveys suggest that fees range from $150 to $1000 per hour when billed hourly. Under "the American rule" attorney fees are usually not paid by the losing party to the winning party in a case, except at the federal level or for specific statutory reasons.
The phrase is a legal term of art in American jurisprudence in which lawyers are collectively referred to as "attorneys", a wording practice not found in most other legal systems. Attorney's fees or attorneys' fees, depending upon number of attorneys involved, or simplified to attorney fees are the fees, including labor charges and costs, charged by lawyers or their firms for legal services provided by them to their clients. They do not include incidental, non-legal costs e.g. expedited shipping costs for legal documents. Generally Nevada being an exception, attorney fees are tabulated separately from court costs, and are also separate from fines, compensatory and punitive damages, and other monies in a legal case not enumerated as court costs.
The analogous concept has differing names and applicability in common law systems such as in most of the Commonwealth of Nations, and in civil law systems such as those of most of Europe and many former European colonies. For example, in a court case under English law, the fees of solicitors and barristers two types of lawyer are combined with court costs and various other expenses into a combined "costs", while non-court solicitor expenses may be separately billed as per-hour charges and those of barristers as daily brief fees. The losing party in a case in most common law systems pays for the costs including fees of both parties.
State laws or bar association regulations, many of which are based on Rule 1.5 of the American Bar Association's Rules of Professional Conduct, govern the terms under which lawyers can accept fees. Many complaints to ethics boards regarding attorneys revolve around excessive attorney's fees.
In some American jurisdictions, a lawyer for the plaintiff in a civil case can take a case on a contingent fee basis. A contingent fee is a percentage of the monetary judgment or settlement. The contingent fee may be split among several firms who have contractual arrangements amongst themselves for referrals or other assistance. Where a plaintiff loses, the attorney may not receive any money for his or her work. Many countries prohibit contingent fees as unethical. Most jurisdictions in the United States prohibit working for a contingent fee in family law or criminal cases.
In the United States, an up-front fee paid to a lawyer is called a retainer. Money within the retainer is often used to "buy" a certain amount of work. Some contracts provide that when the money from the retainer is gone, the fee is renegotiated. This is to be differentiated between a retainer in Commonwealth states, where a retainer is the contract that is initially signed by a client to engage a lawyer. Money may or may not be paid up front, but the lawyer is still "retained".
The range of fees charged by lawyers varies widely from one city to the next. Most large law firms in the United States bill between $200 and $1,000 per hour for their lawyers' time, though fees charged by smaller firms are much lower. The rate varies tremendously by location as well as the specific area of law practiced. Typically insurance defense firms have lower hourly rates than non-insurance firms, but are compensated by having steady, regular paying work provided. Locations like Salt Lake City will average $150 per hour for an associate's time on a basic case, but will increase for larger firms.
Many surveys of hourly rates are done. The American Intellectual Property Law Association "AIPLA" commissions a survey of its members every 2 years and it publishes these in what it calls a "Report of the Economic Survey". The latest one is dated June 2007. Rates are collected for 14 geographic areas and by associate or partner. Many courts have followed the rates shown by these AIPLA surveys and they are highly-regarded for Intellectual Property litigation.
The State Bar of Oregon and the Colorado State Bar also have published a survey of rates for various areas of Oregon and Colorado and these are available online.
Perhaps the most widely followed set of rates are what is called the Laffey Matrix that is available from the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. These have been available since 1982 and are updated each year. The hourly rates are shown by years of experience. For June 1, 2006 to May 31, 2007 the rates are as follows: 20+ years of experience, $425 per hour; 11–19 years, $375; 8–10 years, $305; 4–7 years, $245; 1–3 years, $205; and Paralegals/law clerks $120. The Laffey Matrix appears to be growing in acceptance by many courts throughout the United States, but the matrix must be adjusted to account for higher or lower costs for legal services in other areas.
Hourly rates are increasing almost every year and some lawyers charge substantially higher than the rates shown by the Laffey Matrix. The first American attorney to regularly charge a four-digit hourly fee $1000 and higher was Benjamin Civiletti in late 2005.
With the ongoing recession of the 2000s, corporate clients began driving attorneys increasingly toward alternative fee arrangements, or AFAs. AFAs can include flat fees per matter, fixed fees for a "book" of matters, success bonuses, and other options beyond straight hourly billing.
Laws
Attorney
Attorney General
Attorneys Fee
Confidentiality
Corporate Lawyer
Alabama Judicial Complaint
Alaska Judicial Complaint
Arizona Judicial Complaint
Arkansas Judicial Complaint
California Judicial Complaint
Colorado Judicial Complaint
Connecticut Judicial Complaint
Delaware Judicial Complaint
Automobile
Bangalore
Berlin
Blues Music
Brand Consultant
Budapest
Cairo
Car Rental Classification Code
Celebrity Men
City
Colin Farrell
Cufflinks
Czech
Denver
Dhaka
Diamond Investments
Dui Canada
Emeralds
Frivolous Litigation
George Clooney
Gold Coin
Gold Investors Undeterred
Gold Price In Usa
Green Vehicle
Home Insurance
Individual Karma
Infomercial Portmanteau
Insurance
Internet Marketing
Jewelry Store
Job Of An Attorney
Judge
Judicial Commission
Judicial Complaint
Kamma
Karma Age
Las Vegas
Law
Law Firm
Law Of Karma
Law School
Lawsuit
Lawyer
Lawyer Directory
Limo
Loose Diamonds Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Luxury Car
Megalopolis
Metropolitan Manila
Moscow
My Karma
New York State
Official State Car
Osaka Kobe
Philadelphia
Portland
Practice of Law
Project Management
Retail Store
Rome
Sacramento
Sao Paulo
Seattle
Sell Your Gold
Supreme Court
Term Life Insurance
The Judge
Tokyo
United States Attorney General
United States Classification System
Home
Western Karma
Yoga
Advantage Rent A Car
All Music Guide To The Blues
Atlanta
District of Columbia Judicial Complaint
Empty Judicial Complaint
Florida Judicial Complaint
Georgia Judicial Complaint
Hawaii Judicial Complaint
Home Judicial Complaint
Idaho Judicial Complaint
Illinois Judicial Complaint
Indiana Judicial Complaint
Iowa Judicial Complaint
Kansas Judicial Complaint
Kentucky Judicial Complaint
Louisiana
Maine Judicial Complaint
Maryland Judicial Complaint
Massachusetts Judicial Complaint
Michigan Judicial Complaint
Minnesota Judicial Complaint
Mississippi Judicial Complaint
Missouri Judicial Complaint
Montana Judicial Complaint
Nebraska Judicial Complaint
Nevada Judicial Complaint
New Hampshire Judicial Complaint
New Jersey Judicial Complaint
New Mexico Judicial Complaint
New York Judicial Complaint
Newfoundland and Labrador Judicial Complaint
North Carolina Judicial Complaint
North Dakota Judicial Complaint
Northwest Territories Judicial Complaint
Nova Scotia Blues and Blues Boogie
Nunavut Judge
Ohio Judicial Complaint
Oklahoma Judicial Complaint
Ontario Judicial Complaint
Oregon Judicial Complaint
Pennsylvania Judicial Complaint
Plan Judicial Complaint
Prince Edward Island Blues Boogie
Puerto Rico Judicial Complaint
Quebec Judge
Rhode Island Judicial Complaint
Saskatchewan Judicial Complaint
South Carolina Judicial Complaint
South Dakota Judicial Complaint
Tennessee Judicial Complaint
Texas Judicial Complaint
USA Judicial Complaint
USA Judicial Complaint
Utah Judicial Complaint
Vermont Judicial Complaint
Virgin Islands Judicial Complaint
Virginia Judicial Complaint
Washington Judicial Complaint
West Virginia Judicial Complaint
Wisconsin Judicial Complaint
Wyoming Judicial Complaint
Yukon Judicial Complaint